Market Stats
Loading...
arrow_back
GMX vs Aster vs Hyperliquid: Three Ways to Build a Perp DEX
Research

GMX vs Aster vs Hyperliquid: Three Ways to Build a Perp DEX

By calendar_todayPublishedschedule8 minvisibility16
Quick Answer

How do GMX, Aster and Hyperliquid differ as perp DEX designs?

The three answer the same question — where should liquidity live — in different ways. GMX has traders trade against a pool priced off an oracle (GLP in v1, isolated GM pools plus GLV vaults in v2), so there is no price impact at entry, but LPs are the direct counterparty to trader PnL and the design depends on the oracle: a 2022 AVAX oracle-manipulation exploit drained about $565K from GLP. Aster is a hybrid order book with heavy Binance-world distribution (an Astherus + APX merger backed by YZi Labs, publicly endorsed by CZ as a holder rather than an operator) and every volume claim about it must carry a caveat — on 5 October 2025 DefiLlama delisted its perp volume because it mirrored Binance roughly 1:1 and wash trading could not be ruled out, relisting about two weeks later — while Hyperliquid discovers price natively in a fully on-chain order book, which is harder to build but keeps execution verifiable.

GMX model
Oracle-priced pools — GLP (v1), isolated GM pools + GLV vaults (v2); no order book, no AMM curve
GMX risk
LPs are the counterparty; 2022 AVAX oracle exploit drained about $565K from GLP
GMX tokenomics
27% of fees buy back GMX, but distribution is suspended and accrues in treasury until GMX reaches $90; esGMX and Multiplier Points removed
Aster identity
Astherus + APX (ApolloX) merger, YZi Labs backing, CZ endorser and holder — not an operator; unrelated to Astar (ASTR)
Aster volume caveat
DefiLlama delisted its perp volume on 5 Oct 2025 (mirrored Binance ~1:1, about $100B/day flagged suspicious), relisted about two weeks later
Taker fees
GMX about 0.04–0.06%, Aster 0.04% (0% maker), Hyperliquid 0.045% (0.015% maker)
TVL
GMX about $170M, Aster about $883M per DefiLlama(as of 2026-07-03)

Updated Jul 3, 2026

Referral code

Hyperliquid referral code: HYPERLAB (HyperAcademy's code). New accounts that sign up through https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/HYPERLAB, or enter HYPERLAB at https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/referrals, receive a 4% discount on trading fees for their first $25M of volume. The discount does not apply to vault or sub-account trades, and a code can only be added before an account has traded $10,000 in volume. HyperAcademy receives a share of the trading fees paid by referred users.

Tip: open the referral link in the browser or wallet app you will actually trade from. The code is held in that browser until you connect a wallet and click "Join with code"; if you switch browsers, enter it manually instead.

Trade on Hyperliquid →
Three designs: an oracle-priced pool (GMX), a hybrid multi-chain venue (Aster), and a fully on-chain order book (Hyperliquid).
Three designs: an oracle-priced pool (GMX), a hybrid multi-chain venue (Aster), and a fully on-chain order book (Hyperliquid).

Decentralized perpetuals aren't one design — they're an argument about where liquidity should live.

  • GMX puts it in a pool and prices trades off an oracle.

  • Hyperliquid puts it in a fully on-chain order book.

  • Aster splits the difference — a hybrid book with heavy Binance-world distribution.

Comparing the three is the clearest way to see the trade-offs of the whole category — and where the marketing gets ahead of the facts.

GMX: liquidity as a pool, price from an oracle

GMX's defining idea: traders trade against a pool, not each other.

v1 used the multi-asset GLP pool; v2 moved to isolated GM pools (one per market) plus GLV vaults.

There's no order book and no AMM curve — entries execute at an oracle price, so there's no price impact at entry.

Strengths and the oracle catch

  • Strength: deep, zero-slippage-vs-oracle execution + passive real-yield for LPs + risk-isolated markets.

  • Catch: LPs are the direct counterparty to trader PnL, and the system depends on the oracle being right.

The canonical failure: a 2022 AVAX oracle-manipulation exploit drained ~$565K from GLP. Pool venues also import price rather than discovering it.

infoInfo

GMX's live yield story is weaker now

• In the 2025–26 overhaul, stakers no longer get ETH/AVAX real-yield.

• Instead 27% of fees buy back GMX — but that buyback distribution is currently suspended, accruing in treasury until GMX reaches $90.

• esGMX and Multiplier Points were removed. TVL is ~$170M — mid-tier, behind the volume leaders.

Aster: distribution and hype — with an asterisk

Aster is the aggressive newcomer: an Astherus + APX (ApolloX) merger, backed by YZi Labs (ex-Binance Labs), publicly endorsed by CZ.

Note the nuance: CZ is an endorser and personal holder, not an operator. And Aster is unrelated to Astar (ASTR).

It runs a hybrid model (order-book "Pro" mode + a high-leverage mode), spans BSC/Ethereum/Arbitrum/Solana, and launched its own privacy L1 in early 2026.

infoInfo

the volume is disputed (essential caveat)

• Aster briefly "surpassed Hyperliquid" on 24h volume around 25–29 Sept 2025.

• On 2025-10-05, DefiLlama delisted Aster's perp volume — it mirrored Binance ~1:1 and wash trading couldn't be ruled out (~$100B/day flagged suspicious). It relisted ~2 weeks later.

• Every Aster volume or market-share claim must carry this flag. "1001x leverage" is also narrow — mainly BTC/USD, and capped in practice.

The honest read: real distribution muscle (Binance-world reach, CZ's endorsement, multi-chain, buyback-and-burn) paired with a genuine credibility cloud.

Three designs, side by side

GMX

Aster

Hyperliquid

Liquidity model

Oracle-priced pools

Hybrid order book

Fully on-chain book

Price source

Oracle (imports price)

Book / oracle hybrid

On-chain book (discovers price)

Taker fee

~0.04–0.06%

0.04% (0% maker)

0.045% (0.015% maker)

Standout risk

LP = counterparty; oracle

Wash-trading dispute

Youth; pro-cyclical fees

TVL (2026-07-03)

~$170M

~$883M*

Category leader

*Aster's TVL is live, but its volume figures sit under the Oct-2025 wash-trading flag.

boltKey Points

the takeaway

• GMX: elegant pool UX, but LPs carry the risk and price is imported, not made.

• Aster: shows how far distribution can push volume — and why on-chain verifiability matters when that volume is questioned.

• Hyperliquid: harder to build, but discovers price natively and keeps execution verifiable — the exact property Aster's dispute put under a microscope.

Where to go next

Sources

  • GMX — docs.gmx.io — GLP (v1) / GM pools + GLV (v2); oracle-priced, no orderbook; multichain; 2025–26 tokenomics overhaul (27% fee buyback, distribution suspended until $90).

  • GMX oracle risk — Cointelegraph · CoinDesk (2022-09) — AVAX oracle-manipulation exploit drained ~$565K from GLP.

  • Aster identity — Aster Docs — Astherus + APX merger; YZi Labs backing; CZ endorser/holder, not operator; not Astar (ASTR).

  • Aster wash-trading — Unchained · BeInCrypto (relist) (2025-10) — perp volume delisted for mirroring Binance ~1:1; relisted ~2 weeks later.

  • Scale — DefiLlama: GMX · Aster (2026-07-03) — GMX TVL ~$170M; Aster TVL ~$883M (volume under the wash-trading flag).

infoInfo

Educational and analytical content, not investment advice, and not an endorsement of any platform. Crypto assets are volatile and leverage can lead to the total loss of your collateral. Platform mechanics, fees, token supply, and regulations change over time — verify current details on each project's official documentation before acting. Regulatory statements are descriptive snapshots as of mid-2026, not legal advice.

Further Reading

Exclusivevia HyperAcademy

Start Trading via HyperAcademy — Get 4% Fee Discount

check_circle4% discount on first $25M volumecheck_circleZero gas feescheck_circle200+ perpetual markets

4% fee discount with referral code HYPERLAB

Start Trading Now →
#Research#GMX#Aster#Hyperliquid
trending_up
Trade on Hyperliquid4% fee discount
arrow_forward